> On Jul 26, 2018, at 12:09 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > > Do those use a frequency band that's suitable for cellphones to monitor > (antenna > size, power, etc)? Because your best chance of getting my attention in an > emergency > is to make my phone start shrieking. VHF, on 7 frequencies: 162.400 162.425 162.450 162.475 162.500 162.525 162.550 That’s about 1.85 meter wavelength, so a quarter wave antenna would be pretty large. I’m sure the RF engineers can come up with a way to listen effectively without a huge antenna. —Chris
- Re: California fires: smart speakers and emerg... Sean Donelan
- Re: California fires: smart speakers and ... Brian Kantor
- Re: California fires: smart speakers ... Sean Donelan
- Re: California fires: smart speakers and ... Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG
- Re: California fires: smart speakers ... Seth Mattinen
- RE: California fires: smart speak... Naslund, Steve
- Re: California fires: smart s... Seth Mattinen
- Re: California fires: smart speak... Chris Boyd
- Re: California fires: smart speak... valdis . kletnieks
- Re: California fires: smart s... Nate Metheny
- Re: California fires: smart s... Chris Boyd
- Re: California fires: sm... James Downs
- Re: California fires: sm... Stephen Satchell
- Re: California fires: smart s... Chris Adams
- Re: California fires: smart s... Sean Donelan
- Re: California fires: smart speak... Sean Donelan
- Re: California fires: smart s... Lou Katz
- Re: California fires: smart speakers ... Lou Katz
- Re: California fires: smart speak... joel jaeggli
- Re: California fires: smart s... Mike Hammett
- Re: California fires: smart speak... Sean Donelan