On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Michael Crapse <mich...@wi-fiber.io> wrote:
> For an eyeball network, you cannot count on an IPv6 only network. Because > all of your "customers" will complain because they can't get to hulu, or > any other ipv4 only eyeball service. You still need the ipv4s to operate a > proper network, and good luck figuring out which services are blacklisting > your new /24 because the ipv4 space used to be a VPN provider, and the "in" > thing to do for these services is to block VPNs. > There are many IPv6-only eyeball networks. Definitely many examples in wireless (T-Mobile, Sprint, BT ) and wireline (DT with DS-Lite in Germany, Orange Poland ...) and even more where IPv4 NAT44 + IPv6 is used. Just saying, having ipv6 hedges a lot of risk associate with blacklisting and translation related overhead and potentially scale and cost of IPv4 addresses. > > > On 11 June 2018 at 09:21, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 8:43 AM Stan Ouchakov <st...@imaginesoftware.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > Can anyone recommend transfer market brokers for ipv4 addresses? Need >> > clean /24 asap. ARIN's waiting list is too long... >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > >> > -Stan >> > >> > Meanwhile, FB reports that 75% of mobiles in the USA reach them via ipv6 >> >> https://code.facebook.com/posts/635039943508824/how-ipv6- >> deployment-is-growing-in-u-s-and-other-countries/ >> >> >> And Akaimai reports 80% of mobiles >> >> https://blogs.akamai.com/2018/06/six-years-since-world-ipv6- >> launch-entering-the-majority-phases.html >> >> >> And they both report ipv6 is faster / better. >> > >
