Finding a decent, maintained IPAM is one thing, but migrating is another - do any of these have an easy path from IPPlan?
Thanks --- Dermot Williams Imagine Communications Group Ltd. On Jun 10 2018, at 10:36 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > > One more open source option: > https://www.gestioip.net/ > > Regards, > Jordi > > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: NANOG <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> en nombre de Job Snijders > <j...@instituut.net> > Fecha: domingo, 10 de junio de 2018, 23:01 > Para: Mike Lyon <mike.l...@gmail.com> > CC: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > Asunto: Re: What are people using for IPAM these days? > > Hey Mike, > On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 8:48 PM, Mike Lyon <mike.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Title says it all... Currently using IPPlan, but it is kinda antiquated.. > > This is always a good thing to review every 2-3 years or so. > My current favorites in the open source world are: > Netbox - https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox > NIPAP - http://spritelink.github.io/NIPAP/ > ed - http://man.openbsd.org/ed ;-) > > Give a few of the IPAMs out there a chance and just see which one > suits your operational procedures best! (Though, using a spreadsheet > file on a shared network drive is still not recommended.) > > Kind regards, > Job > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.consulintel.es > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be > considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the > original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
