If they are for redundancy, wouldn't it be preferable to route them to different place to cover more fault scenarios.
I would complain if they are routed to same place. On 2 April 2018 at 22:56, Colin Johnston <col...@gt86car.org.uk> wrote: > dont know if this is a problem but seeing different as paths for 1.0.0.1 and > 1.1.1.1 in UK as lands > > 2 185.61.135.25 (185.61.135.25) 1.964 ms 72.824 ms 72.835 ms > 3 10.254.84.3 (10.254.84.3) 2.671 ms 2.577 ms 2.601 ms > 4 31.28.72.22 (31.28.72.22) 2.798 ms 2.897 ms 3.123 ms > 5 * * * > 6 * * * > 7 ve160.er2.thn.as50056.net (178.18.119.90) 3.786 ms 178.18.122.193 > (178.18.122.193) 2.542 ms ve160.er2.thn.as50056.net (178.18.119.90) 3.736 ms > 8 * 1dot1dot1dot1.cloudflare-dns.com (1.1.1.1) 3.350 ms * > > > > 2 185.61.135.25 (185.61.135.25) 3.172 ms 3.154 ms 3.130 ms > 3 10.254.84.3 (10.254.84.3) 3.228 ms 3.525 ms 3.502 ms > 4 31.28.72.22 (31.28.72.22) 3.781 ms 3.869 ms 3.857 ms > 5 * * * > 6 ve165.er1.the.as50056.net (94.126.43.225) 16.655 ms 9.496 ms 9.454 ms > 7 lonap.as13335.net (5.57.81.75) 91.859 ms 2.484 ms 196.896 ms > 8 1dot1dot1dot1.cloudflare-dns.com (1.0.0.1) 2.504 ms 2.804 ms 2.799 ms > > > Colin > -- ++ytti
