DNS64 “works” if you ignore what it breaks. MAP-T does NAT46 to the NAT64 and doesn’t have the side effects of DNS64.
Why people insist that DNS64 is a “good" way to direct traffic to the NAT 64 I don’t understand. MAP-T directs the traffic to the NAT64 without the side effects. DNS64 was only ever a stop gap mechanism with lots of know side effects. Mark > On 21 Dec 2017, at 10:01 am, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 5:54 PM Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > As someone who has written a DNS64 implementation - DO NOT USE DNS64. DNS64 > breaks stuff. > > Use MAP-T. For those of you using DNS64 on the cellar side MAP-T can use the > NAT64 you already have. > > Mark > > > That’s just your opinion, man. Works for me and my 70 million customers. > > Anything that is broken by DNS64 can be properly fixed by eliminating the > need for it — by deploying ipv6. DNS64 only appears when the far end resource > is single stacked (!) > > We won’t be held hostage by folks who refuse to deploy ipv6, those days are > over > > Happy holidays! > > > > > On 21 Dec 2017, at 9:33 am, Jens Link <li...@quux.de> wrote: > > > > Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> http://jool.mx/en/index.html > >> > >> Free open source nat64 > > > > And the DNS64 part can be done with powerdns (recursor), unbound, bind, > > ... All OpenSource > > > > Jens > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > | Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | > > | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jensl...@quux.de | --------------- | > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
