Nothing wrong with using xxx.0 or xxx::0 in the context of a host route (/32 or /128).
- Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 Ryan Hamel
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 Hunter Fuller
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 Job Snijders
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 Christopher Morrow
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 Job Snijders
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 Radu-Adrian Feurdean
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 Jason Kuehl
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 valdis . kletnieks
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 William Herrin
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 Ryan Hamel
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 William Herrin
- Re: Static Routing 172.16.0.0/32 Ryan Hamel
