it worked here in Brazil against whatsapp.
Em 19/10/2017 13:49, Lee Howard escreveu:
On 10/17/17, 5:33 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Christopher Morrow"
<nanog-boun...@nanog.org on behalf of morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
you know, the Sci-Hub folk could fix this themselves... with some
authentication requirements... and probably by just unplugging from the
intertubes?
"Sci-Hub’s founder, has previously told The Scientist the site plans to
ignore the lawsuit.” How would Sci-Hub consider this a “fix”?
What enforcement mechanism would the Court have against Sci-Hub?
The idea of making third parties (ISPs) incur costs (updating ACLs or
poisoning DNS) to enforce the order is pretty bad, and doesn’t stop Tor
access. Sorry I didn’t have a chance to file an amicus before the ruling
tomorrow.
Lee
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Robert Mathews (OSIA)
<math...@hawaii.edu>
wrote:
Judge Recommends Ruling to Block Internet Access to Sci-Hub
The American Chemical Society seeks a broad order that includes millions
of dollars in damages and demands action from Internet service providers
and search engines.
By Diana Kwon | October 4, 2017
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/50563/
title/Judge-Recommends-Ruling-to-Block-Internet-Access-to-Sci-Hub/
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/50361/
title/Publishers--Legal-Action-Advances-Against-Sci-Hub/
