Do they publicly have any more info on this? I thought CloudFlare didn’t consider doing that because of their vast coverage and peering arrangements provided by their PoPs.
Regards, Marco Slater > On 29 Sep 2017, at 14:38, <michalis.bersi...@hq.cyta.gr> > <michalis.bersi...@hq.cyta.gr> wrote: > > I think that Cloudflare has a caching solution, but I think they have strict > requirements towards the isp in order to install them on their premises. > > Best Regards, > > Michalis Bersimis > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Gould > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 6:25 PM > To: Nanog@nanog.org > Subject: isp/cdn caching > > Hi, I've been aware of a few caching providers for a few years now, but I'm > learning of others as time goes on. which makes me curious if there are more > springing up and gaining popularity. I'm speaking of ISP-type caching > whereas the cache provider sends hardware servers and perhaps a switch to the > local ISP to install locally in their network. Can someone please send a > simple list of what they know is the current players in this ISP Caching > space? I'll list the ones I know about and you please let me know of others. > This seems to be an evolving/growing thing and I'm curious of where we are > today for significant providers and possibly up-and-coming ones that I should > know about. (amazon prime has my wondering also.) > > > > Google (GGC) > > Netflix (OCA) > > Akamai (AANP) > > Facebook (FNA) > > Apple (I heard this isn't isp-located like the others, but unsure) > > ? others ? > > ? others ? > > ? others ? > > > > -Aaron Gould >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
