Hi,
but isn't peer A prefix-out a synonym for peer B prefix-in, that will
lead to the same result, e.g. a BGP teardown?
I just feel that this will add another factor, that people will not use
or abuse: neigh $x max-out infinite
What about adding an option to the BGP session that A & B do agree on a
fixed number of prefixes in both directions, so Bs prefix-in could be As
prefix-out automatically?
Jörg
On 31 Aug 2017, at 7:01, Alejandro Acosta wrote:
What a terrific idea..., simple & useful
El 29/8/17 a las 1:41 p.m., Michael Still escribió:
I agree a max-prefix outbound could potentially be useful and would
hopefully not be too terribly difficult to implement for most
vendors.
Perhaps RFC4486 would need to be updated to reflect this as a
possibility as well?
