Mel,

There was a Cisco bug many years ago that caused lots of issues. Since then we 
have limited max-as to 50 and it has not caused any reported issues yet.

Link that does not require a CCO login to view.
http://blog.ipspace.net/2009/02/oversized-as-paths-cisco-ios-bug.html

Regards

Steve Lalonde


> On 21 Jun 2017, at 16:49, Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org> wrote:
> 
> Steinar,
> 
> What reason is there to filter them? They are not a significant fraction of 
> BGP paths. They cause no harm. It's just your sense of tidiness. 
> 
> You might consider contacting one of the operators to see if they do have a 
> good reason you haven't considered. But absent a good reason *to* filter 
> them, I would let BGP mechanics work as intended.
> 
> -mel beckman
> 
> On Jun 21, 2017, at 12:57 AM, "sth...@nethelp.no" <sth...@nethelp.no> wrote:
> 
>>> Just wondering if anyone else saw this yesterday afternoon ?
>>> 
>>> Jun 20 16:57:29:E:BGP: From Peer 38.X.X.X received Long AS_PATH=3D AS_SEQ(2=
>>> ) 174 12956 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 234=
>>> 56 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 =
>>> 23456 23456 23456 23456 23456 ... attribute length (567) More than configur=
>>> ed MAXAS-LIMIT
>> 
>> There are quite a few examples of people using stupidly long AS paths.
>> For instance
>> 
>> 177.23.232.0/24    *[BGP/170] 00:52:40, MED 0, localpref 105
>>                     AS path: 6939 16735 28163 28163 28163 28163 28163 28163 
>> 28163 28163 28163 28163 28163 28163 28163 28163 28163 28163 262401 262401 
>> 262401 262401 262401 262401 262401 262401 262401 262401 262401 262401 262401 
>> 262401 262401 262401 262949 52938 52938 52938 52938 52938 52938 52938 52938 
>> 52938 52938 52938 I
>> 
>> I currently have 27 prefixes in my Internet routing table with 40 or
>> more ASes in the AS path (show route aspath-regex ".{40,}").
>> 
>> I see no valid reason for such long AS paths. Time to update filters
>> here. I'm tempted to set the cutoff at 30 - can anybody see a good
>> reason to permit longer AS paths?
>> 
>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no

Reply via email to