Yeah, I was wondering about that 4x100G. is that a necessity or a "because we can" move?
-----Original Message----- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Dugas Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 4:35 PM To: Aaron Gould <aar...@gvtc.com> Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: RE: NANOG 70 network diagram and upstream And the 4x100G. That's four times the capacity of the network I work for. ~100k subs. On Jun 2, 2017 16:54, "Aaron Gould" <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > Btw.... > > Wow, a ~2 million dollar boundary (dual PTX1000's) for the NANOG 70 > conference.... geez > > -aaron > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke > Sent: Friday, June 2, 2017 1:43 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org list <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: NANOG 70 network diagram and upstream > > Just a small thing, but as one of the folks who used to work on the > core network gear of AS11404, the network diagram has something in it > that might confuse attendees as to who is really sponsoring the upstream: > > https://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog70/diagram > > AS11404 was formerly known as Spectrum Networks, acquired in 2013 by > Wavedivision Holdings LLC (Wave Broadband) and became the backbone of > the Wave network. It's a totally different thing than the Charter > service which is trademarked as as Spectrum. > > https://www.peeringdb.com/asn/11404 > > The logo in the right side bubble there shouldn't be the > Charter/Spectrum trademarked font, but rather should be Wave, who > built the dark fiber into the hotel and are providing the upstream. > The last mile fiber into the hotel is Wave. > > > -Eric > >
