As of this announcement: http://investor.cisco.com/investor-relations/news-and-events/news/news-details/2017/Cisco-Announces-Intent-to-Acquire-Viptela/default.aspx
there will be one less than before :-) Seriously - when I first learned about them, upon service inclusion of the Viptela products into the VzB SD-WAN offering, they (Viptela - http://blog.ipspace.net/2014/11/viptela-sen-hybrid-wan-connectivity.html) looked very nice, already, as standalone products. And that was a few years back. ***Stefan On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Doug Marschke <d...@sdnessentials.com> wrote: > Too many to list. I don’t know who is “winning” in market share right > now, as I am sure each vendor tracks their wins differently. > > There are definitely a few making more noise than others. > > Doug Marschke > > CTO > > <http://www.sdnessentials.com> www.sdnessentials.com > > JNCIE-SP #41, JNCIE-ENT #3 > > 415-902-5702 (cell) > > 415-340-3112 (office) > > > > From: Colton Conor [mailto:colton.co...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 6:26 PM > To: Doug Marschke <d...@sdnessentials.com> > Cc: Kasper Adel <karim.a...@gmail.com>; NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: SD-WAN for enlightened > > > > So who are the big SD-WAN players out there? > > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Doug Marschke <d...@sdnessentials.com > <mailto:d...@sdnessentials.com> > wrote: > > Hello Kasper, > > I will do my best to answer your SD-WAN question, but as you mentioned it > is a buzzword that has a bit of confusion in its definitions. I would say > that a SD-WAN solution should have the following elements: > > 1.) Ability to manage multiple WAN connection and choose the path based on > user and machine criteria (The Hybrid WAN) > 2.) A controller to manage the polices and operations of the SD-WAN devices > 3.) Analytics on the network and application level > 4.) A software overlay that abstracts and secures the underlying networks > > Currently there are a lot of solutions out there by many vendors. Some do > all of these and some a subset, so it make the landscape a bit confusing. > Lots of times vendors use SD-WAN when they are really just talking about > Hybrid WAN (multiple connections) or WAN optimization. > > > > > > Doug Marschke > CTO > www.sdnessentials.com <http://www.sdnessentials.com> > JNCIE-SP #41, JNCIE-ENT #3 > 415-902-5702 <tel:415-902-5702> (cell) > 415-340-3112 <tel:415-340-3112> (office) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org <mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog. > org> ] On Behalf Of Kasper Adel > Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2017 1:14 PM > To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org <mailto:nanog@nanog.org> > > Subject: SD-WAN for enlightened > > Hi, > > I'm not sure if the buzzword SD-WAN is used to compensate for another > buzzword that got over-utilized (SDN) or it is a true 'new and improved' > way of doing things that has some innovation into it. > > I heard different explanation from different vendors: > > 1) appliances (+ controller) placed in-line to put traffic in tunnels > based on policy, with some DPI and traffic tagging...(to do > performance/policy based routing) over an expensive link (MPLS) and a cheap > one (broadband) with some 'firewall-like' filtering capabilities. > 2) same as above, with a flavor of 'machine learning' to find a pattern > for traffic to optimize utilization. > 3) a controller that instantiates and tears down tunnels from 'classic > routers' based on external policies and Network based features to do > performance based routing over an expensive link (MPLS) and a cheap one > (broadband) with encryption. > > Is the above a decent high-level summary? > > Has anyone tried any of these solutions, any general feedback ? > > Cheers, > Kim > > > >
