Has there been some assessment of how justified have those seeking the "right to be forgotten" been in becoming forgotten? By doing so does it risk changing the record in a way that is not beneficial to the community and historical record?
I warmly second the plaudit and thanks to Brandon for his support of UKNOF. He has played a very substantial part in making UKNOF what it is today. Christian > Chris Russell <mailto:ch...@nifry.com> > 14 March 2017 at 08:23 > > > We've had this within UKNOF ... sometimes people do not wish to be > recorded, mainly due to confidentiality reasons (ie: advance heads up, > or personal thoughts delivered to a specific audience). Occasionally > we have been asked to remove recordings at a later date due to > changing circumstances etc. > > We explicitly mention the webcast/records on abstract submissions > from memory, and also recently introduced shepherding to help > presentations be more relevant (both to the speakers to help them in > pushing a $clue or message, to our audience to ensure relevance and to > us in terms of protection from litigation, etc). This applies to both > submitted AND sponsor talks (the latter being incredibly useful and > has shown a major increase in sponsor talk relevance and feedback > ratings). > > People will always mention a lack of recording/webcast for this type > of content ... but then arguably that is a driver to attend in person. > > Thanks > > Chris > (UKNOF PC Chair) > > > > Patrick W. Gilmore <mailto:patr...@ianai.net> > 13 March 2017 at 22:10 > > <speaking only for myself> > > Speakers are informed they are going to be recorded. If they have > sensitive information, they can choose a track and ask it not be > recorded. NANOG has done this in the past, but you should talk to the > Program Committee if you are interested in this. > > Steve Feldman <mailto:feld...@twincreeks.net> > 13 March 2017 at 22:06 > > Many attendees also find value in the parts of the conference that > aren't recorded, like hallway conversations, informal meetings, and > even social events. > > Keeping and maintaining the archive of slides and video recordings is > an essential part of NANOG's educational mission, which was key to > obtaining and maintaining the IRS 401(c)(3) nonprofit status. > > So at least for the time I was on the Board, not only were there no > regrets, but we worked hard to maintain and enhance the video experience. > Steve > > > Mike Hammett <mailto:na...@ics-il.net> > 13 March 2017 at 21:52 > Another organization I'm in has a hard policy of no recordings of any > sessions at their conferences. They think that recordings of content > (even vendor-sponsored, vendor-specific sessions with vendor consent) > would have a catastrophic effect on conference attendance. > > NANOG doesn't seem to have that issue. Any background on the process > to get there? Any regrets? > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > > Midwest Internet Exchange > > The Brothers WISP > -- Christian de Larrinaga FBCS, CITP, ------------------------- @ FirstHand ------------------------- +44 7989 386778 c...@firsthand.net -------------------------
