I believe that. However it behooves us to give any of our members' ideas a fair hearing. I'm hoping he'll get some good push back in the session.
Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com 218 565 9365 On Mar 6, 2017 11:14 AM, "William Herrin" <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Joly MacFie <j...@punkcast.com> wrote: > > To say that Mr. Chen's EZIP proposal has not, thus far, been received > with > > open arms by the networking community would be an understatement. It is > > seen as delaying the inevitable and introducing an impractical extra > > routing hardware layer that will be hit & miss. Nevertheless, since much > of > > the world is still IPv4 dependent, it just could take off. ISOC-NY is > happy > > to give him the opportunity to expound on its merits. > > We'd welcome some expert respondents. > > > > See: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chen-ati-ipv4-with- > adaptive-address-space-00 > > Hi Joly, > > If something like this was going to happen, we could have expanded the > v4 address space to 64 bits with IPxl: > http://bill.herrin.us/network/ipxl.html > > At this point IPv6 has enough momentum that it can be safely expected > to happen. That means all proposals for extending the IPv4 address > space are basically dead in the water, especially complicated ones. > > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > -- > William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us > Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> >
