On 21/02/2017 08:22, Nagarjun Govindraj via NANOG wrote: > I am trying to solve the problem of BGP IP prefix hijack detection for the > AS we own using RPKI system. > But IP addresses covered under RPKI system is very less under 10%. > How is community dealing with UNKNOWN state for the prefixes when queried > against RPKI system. Suggest reading: https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/3_Gilad_Are_We_There_v1.pdf from NANOG 69 earlier this month.
Regards, Hank > Reply from the community members shows that majority are using RPKI system. > Is community using anyother methods on top of RPKI ? > > Regards, > Nagarjun > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 3:31 PM Alex Band <al...@ripe.net> wrote: > >> Hi Nagarjun, >> >> You can find some statistics on adoption, coverage and quality here: >> >> http://certification-stats.ripe.net >> >> https://lirportal.ripe.net/certification/content/static/statistics/world-roas.html >> http://rpki.surfnet.nl >> >> All the best, >> >> Alex Band >> >>> On 20 Feb 2017, at 06:52, Nagarjun Govindraj via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> >> wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> where can I found the current coverage of IP prefixes under RPKI system. >>> Stats like total prefixes issued collectively by all the organisations >> like >>> RIR's/IANA/ISP's. >>> stats like prefixes coverd under RPKI system. >>> >>> The goal is to detect the BGP IP prefix hijacking using RPKI system. >>> I would like to know the coverage before adopting RPKI system. >>> >>> I would like to know the suggestions from the community on using this >>> system. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Nagarjun >>> >>
