On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 12:39:44PM -0500, Ken Chase wrote: > Seems to me this random prefix-based blocking by major sites, > then let's-use-nanog-to-fix-it, is not a great methodology.
You're correct. It's not. > What more 'official' and formalized mechanisms can we use? RFC 2142 stipulates role addresses for a variety of functions, many of which were in common use and some of which were considered best practices even before they were formalized 20 years ago. A *lot* of the traffic here (and on other mailing lists) winds up here (and on other mailing lists) because some incompetent/negligent operations don't support those. ---rsk
