Maybe he's found what's already known and posted 2 months ago (and every 2 months?) on nanog, the TCP 98,000x amplifier (which is a little higher than 100x), among dozens of misbehaving devices, all >200x amp.
https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/woot14/woot14-kuhrer.pdf (Table 1's 'total load risk', (not calculated; Im using potential #hosts * amp factor) shows that each protocol listed curiously all have similar values, within 40%. Little too curious, in fact. I'd expect distribution across a few magnitudes.) /kc -- Ken Chase - m...@sizone.org Guelph Canada
