> It's also generally counter to them being available outside of that > network.
This does not follow and is not a natural consequence of sealing the little buggers up so that they cannot affect the Internet (or you private networks). Even if you lock you pet mouse in a cage, you can still feed it and clean up the shit in the cage. It just isn't free to wander out and eat the floral arrangements on the end-table. > (web and proprietary interfaces needed, SSH and telnet not). > That's also not much I can do as a network operator. > > > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > Midwest-IX > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Chris Boyd" <cb...@gizmopartners.com> > To: "Elizabeth Zwicky via NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org> > Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2016 11:42:05 AM > Subject: Re: Death of the Internet, Film at 11 > > > > On Oct 22, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Mike Hammett <na...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > > > "taken all necessary steps to insure that none of the numerous specific > types of CCVT thingies that Krebs and others identified" > > > > Serious question... how? > > Putting them behind a firewall without general Internet access seems to > work for us. We have a lot of cheap IP cameras in our facility and none of > them can reach the net. But this is probably a bit beyond the capabilities > of the general home user. > > —Chris >
