-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 10/21/2016 5:52 PM, Laszlo Hanyecz wrote:
> > On 2016-10-22 00:39, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> P.S. To all of you Ayn Rand devotees out there who still >> vociferously argue that it's nobody else's business how you >> monitor or police your "private" networks, and who still refuse >> to take even minimalist steps (like BCP 38), congratulations. > > What does BCP38 have to do with this? All that does is block one > specific type of attack (and cause a lot of collateral damage). > The IoT devices do not need to spoof addresses - they can just > generate attack traffic directly. This is even better, because you > can't cut those eyeball addresses off - those are the same > addresses your target audience is using. If you cut off the > eyeball networks there's not much point to running an internet > business website anymore. > Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. - - ferg (BCP38 instigator) - -- Paul Ferguson ICEBRG.io, Seattle USA -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EAREIAAYFAlgKunAACgkQKJasdVTchbJJCQD+N6cosKffmfTqERBJ8q3pX+20 jY/FQvzUuKoy+iY3C4wA/2qKV01Z0e16BQ0/030euhCCmTUW0jut+Hp8xyWrVKkN =+oT7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
