On 9/27/16 5:46 PM, Alistair Mackenzie wrote: > Thanks for this, it shows as > > apnic|ZZ|ipv4|103.***.***.0|1024|20160927|reserved||e-stats > > I expect this still stands with it being reserved?
I'm not sure why you would bother obscuring it. What purpose does that serve in furthering the discussion? If it's not route-views>show ip bgp 103.6.232.0/22 BGP routing table entry for 103.6.232.0/22, version 87113221 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table default) Not advertised to any peer Refresh Epoch 1 3277 39710 20632 31133 58073 195.208.112.161 from 195.208.112.161 (194.85.4.4) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external, best Community: 3277:39710 20632:65441 65535:65000 rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0x0 What is it? > > > William, it's 100% an apnic range and shows no org and is registered > to the APNIC Hostmaster. This applies for both the ASN and the address > space. > > > On 28 September 2016 at 01:28, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Alistair Mackenzie <magics...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> I've come across a network which seem to be getting transit yet both the >>> ASN and IP space is not allocated by the RIR. >> Hi Alistair, >> >> There is still unicast address space that isn't allocated by any RIR? >> >> Seriously though, check all your bases. Is not the space unallocated >> by all RIRs or just the one you expect to hold it? If you have a >> transit provider that's not playing by the rules, contact their >> transit providers to complain and if you still don't get satisfaction, >> I'd name and shame the lot of them. Failure to filter bad actors is >> how prefix hijacking happens. >> >> Regards, >> Bill Herrin >> >> >> >> -- >> William Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us >> Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/> >> >> > On 28 September 2016 at 01:36, George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org> wrote: > >> check if the block is in this file. >> >> http://labs.apnic.net/delegated-nro-extended >> >> If not, then the block is hijacked or being abused. >> >> the file format is a bit obscure: the ipv4 record is base-ip|hostcount >> but converting that to prefix length is pretty simple. >> >> -G >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 10:18 AM, Alistair Mackenzie >> <magics...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've come across a network which seem to be getting transit yet both the >>> ASN and IP space is not allocated by the RIR. It does appear at some >> point >>> that it was valid however this is no longer the case. >>> >>> The network is single homed and I tried asking the transit provider what >>> their policy was on this but got no answer. >>> >>> Has anyone seen anything like this? What has happened in the past with >>> things like this? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Alistair
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature