On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Bill Woodcock <wo...@pch.net> wrote:
> > > On Sep 24, 2016, at 7:47 AM, John Levine <jo...@iecc.com> wrote: > > > >>> Well...by anycast, I meant BGP anycast, spreading the "target" > >>> geographically to a dozen or more well connected/peered origins. At > that > >>> point, your ~600G DDoS might only be around > >> > >> anycast and tcp? the heck you say! :) > > > > People who've tried it say it works fine. > > It’s worked fine for 28 years, for me. > > > boy, it'd sure be nice if there were some 'science' and 'measurement' behind such statements. Didn't k-root do some anycast studies ~8-10 years back? -chris (note I'm totally a believer in anycast for tcp in the 'right' circumstances, but often it feels like talking to climate-change-deniers when proffering it as a solution)
