If it’s 100% for redundancy, why not just ECMP defaults and not take a full table?
That will allow you to use a MUCH cheaper router with a much simpler configuration. Owen > On Jun 22, 2016, at 13:04 , David Charlebois <dcharleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello > I'm curious about the overall recommendation when selecting a small class > BGP router for IPv6 (with 1gig ports). We can see the current IPv4 routing > table is around 615k routes and the IPv6 routing table is sitting around > ~31k routes. > > In our case, we advertise a single /24 from our head office to 2 upstream > providers. The routing is %100 for redundancy. > > Somebody mentioned that the Brocade CER-RT was once a best seller. Brocade > are now offering the CER 4X-RT version at 256K IPv6 routes supported (1.5M > IPv4 routes). We don't have immediate plans for IPv6, but I do foresee this > in a few year. Question is - is 256k IPv6 routes suitable? > > Thanks > Dave
