> On Jun 17, 2016, at 10:10 , Mark Milhollan <m...@pixelgate.net> wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Jun 2016, Owen DeLong wrote: >> On Jun 14, 2016, at 11:57 , Ricky Beam <jfb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> I've seen many "IPv6 Capable" CPEs that apply ZERO security to IPv6 >>> traffic. >> >> Those are by definition poorly designed CPE. > > This (open by default vs closed) has been discussed before, with plenty > of people on either side. > > > /mark
I’m unaware of anyone advocating open inbound by default residential CPE. I’m not saying they don’t exist, but I can’t imagine how anyone could possibly defend that position rationally. I’m pretty much in favor of open by default in most things, but for inbound traffic to residential CPE? Even I find that hard to rationalize. Owen
