Why? I use Mobile Hotspot… It’s part of the service I pay for. If Cameron can’t make that work, then that’s T-Mobile’s problem, not mine.
Owen > On Jun 8, 2016, at 1:25 PM, joel jaeggli <joe...@bogus.com> wrote: > > On 6/8/16 9:13 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> As of last week, I still wasn’t getting an IPv6 address by default on my >> iPhone 6S+ >> on T-Mobile. > > turn off mobile hotspot... > >> Just saying. >> >> Owen >> >>> On Jun 7, 2016, at 11:00 AM, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016, Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Very true - I was being a bit extremist out of frustration, but I think >>>> you're spot on - he.net tunnels and even 6to4 are toys to provide IPv6 >>>> support, not actually IPv6 support. >>>> >>>> And I'm quite frustrated because there's so little actual v6 support, and >>>> I *do* actually need it on a daily basis for work. >>>> >>>> Because there's no actual ISP IPv6 support anywhere else (in parts of the >>>> US that *have* multiple ISPs), you can't even make the case to your ISP >>>> that it's a legitimate requirement for you because they know you're not >>>> really going to get v6 elsewhere. >>>> >>>> >>> I think we have different definitions of "no actual isp ipv6 support" >>> >>> Again, a helpful akamai blog >>> https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/four-years-since-world-ipv6-launch-entering-the-mainstream.html >>> >>> fixed line: Comcast, AT&T, TWC, just to name the largest in the nation have >>> meaningful deployments of ipv6. The only thing holding back greater >>> deployment for those networks are legacy CPE that will age out slowly. >>> >>> All 4 of the national mobile operator have ipv6 default on for most >>> new phone models. >>> >>> Yes, many gaps to fill still. But, on "my network" with shy of 70 million >>> users, everything has ipv6 except the iPhone, and that will change RSN. And >>> for users with v6, the majority of their traffic is ipv6 e2e since the >>> whales (google, fb, netflix, increasingly Akamai) are dual stack. >>> >>> CB >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:22 AM Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cb.li...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016, Cryptographrix <cryptograph...@gmail.com >>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','cryptograph...@gmail.com');>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> As I said to Netflix's tech support - if they advocate for people to turn >>>>>> off IPv6 on their end, maybe Netflix should stop supporting it on their >>>>>> end. >>>>>> >>>>>> It's in the air whether it's just an HE tunnel issue or an IPv6 issue at >>>>>> the moment, and if their tech support is telling people to turn off IPv6, >>>>>> maybe they should just instead remove their AAAA records. >>>>>> >>>>>> (or fail back to ipv4 when v6 looks like a tunnel) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> I think you need to reset your expectations of a free tunnel service. >>>>> >>>>> he.net tunnels are a toy for geeks looking to play with v6. In terms of >>>>> Netflix subcriber base, it is amazing insignificant number of users. >>>>> >>>>> At the end of the day, anonymous tunnels, just like linux, are not >>>>> supported by Netflix. And, he.net tunnel users are hurting ipv6 overall >>>>> just like 6to4 by injecting FUD and other nonesense complexity.... For a >>>>> toy. >>>>> >>>>> Move on to a real issue instead of beating this dead horse. >>>>> >>>>> CB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM Mark Felder <f...@feld.me> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 22:25, Spencer Ryan <sr...@arbor.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The tunnelbroker service acts exactly like a VPN. It allows you, >>>>>> from any >>>>>>>> arbitrary location in the world with an IPv4 address, to bring >>>>>> traffic >>>>>>> out >>>>>>>> via one of HE's 4 POP's, while completely masking your actual >>>>>> location. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Perhaps Netflix should automatically block any connection that's not >>>>>> from >>>>>>> a known residential ISP or mobile ISP as anything else could be a >>>>>> server >>>>>>> someone is proxying through. It's very easy to get these subnets -- the >>>>>>> spam filtering folks have these subnets well documented. /s >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Mark Felder >>>>>>> f...@feld.me >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >> >> > >
