> Altering routing and/or adding capacity/capabilities to the existing > infrastructure is generally better
Yes ... but as mentioned in one of the off-list replies: the original DNS are from a 3rd party and they had no chance to expand resources ... best regards Jürgen Jaritsch Head of Network & Infrastructure ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] Im Auftrag von Roland Dobbins Gesendet: Donnerstag, 02. Juni 2016 11:30 An: nanog@nanog.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Verizon and Level3 DNS flush On Jun 2, 2016, at 3:42 PM, Jürgen Jaritsch <jjarit...@anexia-it.com> wrote: > it IS expected behavior that traffic will switch over to the new DNS. Altering routing and/or adding capacity/capabilities to the existing infrastructure is generally better, whenever possible, due to the cache-flushing challenges you're now experiencing. Sometimes it isn't possible, of course. ----------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net>
