On 03/05/16 21:23, Marco Paesani wrote: > Hi Arnold, > nobody answer at 'peer...@green.ch' for this reason I write here on NANOG. > Ciao, > > > Marco Paesani > > > Skype: mpaesani > Mobile: +39 348 6019349 > Success depends on the right choice ! > Email: ma...@paesani.it >
Marco. As I've told you when you hunted me down the last time through backside channels.. :) When you don't get an answer on peering@ addresses its not because they don't read the emails. Instead of declining a peering-request formally people tend to just use the silent treatment and have that represent a "No". If you don't hear back - you probably don't fulfill the requirements to be eligible to peer with a network and for a big network with selective or restrictive policy, answering "no" to emails all day long isn't productive for anyone. This is one of MANY unwritten rules in the peering-world which can be hard to grasp at first. To understand the nomenclature and the "rules", going on a field trip to conferences such as NANOG, RIPE, EPF, GPF and the such is a great way to understand the game, so one can act accordingly to how the playfield looks like. -- hugge @ AS2603
