Baldur Norddahl wrote: > With two uplinks that is highly unlikely to the point of being impossible. > There is no topology change upstream that can cause a situation where it is > not possible to do a high degree of aggregation of the full default free > routing table before loading it in the FIB.
which is why I qualified this in a previous posting: > The more paths you receive from different sources, the more likely it > is that this list of 120k "superfluous" prefixes will converge > towards zero. Agreed that small numbers of paths are most unlikely to create the conditions for this problem to occur. Nick
