On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net> wrote: > Not wishing to get into a pissing war with who is right or wrong, but it > sounds like google already pays or has an agreement with cogent for v4, as > that's unaffected, cogent says google is simply not advertising v6 prefixes > to them, so, how is that cogent's fault? >
Did you check that on Cogent's LookingGlass? "BGP routing table entry for 216.239.32.0/24, version 3740382954 Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table) 6453 15169 154.54.13.206 (metric 10102020) from 154.54.66.21 (154.54.66.21) Origin IGP, metric 4294967294, localpref 100, valid, internal, best Community: 174:10031 174:20666 174:21000 174:22013 Originator: 66.28.1.9, Cluster list: 154.54.66.21" is a lookup on: http://www.cogentco.com/en/network/looking-glass if 216.239.32.0 - which holds ns1.google.com... I'd expect that ns1.google.com would be routed via the majority of links 15169 has with the world. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jon Lewis [mailto:jle...@lewis.org] > Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 11:26 AM > To: Jürgen Jaritsch <jjarit...@anexia-it.com> > Cc: Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net>; North American Network > Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org> > Subject: Re: AW: Cogent - Google - HE Fun > > In other words, GOOG is playing peering chicken with Cogent for IPv6. I'm > not surprised. I suggested it during talks with GOOG roughly 10 years > ago...not saying I had any influence...I'm pretty sure I did not. :) > > GOOG wants Cogent to peer. Cogent wants GOOG to pay for transit (from them > or someone else to get to Cogent). If you're well peered / multihomed, it's > not much of an issue. If you're a single-homed Cogent customer, you should > complain to Cogent that they're not providing full > IPv6 connectivity. > > On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Jürgen Jaritsch wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> mail from Cogent: >>>>>> >> Dear Cogent Customer, >> >> Thank you for contacting Cogent Customer Support for information about the >> Google IPv6 addresses you are unable to reach. >> >> Google uses transit providers to announce their IPv4 routes to Cogent. >> >> At this time however, Google has chosen not to announce their IPv6 routes to >> Cogent through transit providers. >> >> We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you and will notify you if >> there is an update to the situation. >> <<<< >> >> Mail from Google: >>>>>> >> Unfortunately it seems that your transit provider does not have IPv6 >> connectivity with Google. We suggest you ask your transit provider to look >> for alternatives to interconnect with us. >> >> Google maintains an open interconnect policy for IPv6 and welcomes any >> network to peer with us for access via IPv6 (and IPv4). For those networks >> that aren't able, or chose not to peer with Google via IPv6, they are able >> to reach us through any of a large number of transit providers. >> >> For more information in how to peer directly with Google please visit >> https://peering.google.com <<<< >> >> best regards >> >> Jürgen Jaritsch >> Head of Network & Infrastructure >> >> ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH >> >> Telefon: +43-5-0556-300 >> Telefax: +43-5-0556-500 >> >> E-Mail: jjarit...@anexia-it.com >> Web: http://www.anexia-it.com >> >> >> >> Anschrift Hauptsitz Klagenfurt: Feldkirchnerstraße 140, 9020 >> Klagenfurt >> Geschäftsführer: Alexander Windbichler >> Firmenbuch: FN 289918a | Gerichtsstand: Klagenfurt | UID-Nummer: AT >> U63216601 >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces+jjaritsch=anexia-it....@nanog.org] Im >> Auftrag von Dennis Burgess >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 09. März 2016 17:01 >> An: North American Network Operators' Group >> Betreff: Cogent - Google - HE Fun >> >> I just noticed that I am NOT getting IPV6 Google prefixes though Cogent at >> all. I was told google pulled all of their peering with Cogent? If I bring >> up a SIT tunnel with HE, I get the prefixes but at horrible speed and >> latency .. anyone else? >> >> [DennisBurgessSignature] >> www.linktechs.net<http://www.linktechs.net/> - 314-735-0270 x103 - >> dmburg...@linktechs.net<mailto:dmburg...@linktechs.net> >> >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route > | therefore you are _________ > http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________