Dear John, On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:15:29PM +0000, John Curran wrote: > One of the concerns raised at a previous NANOG was with respect to the > need for an RPKI relying parties to explicitly accept ARIN's relying > party agreement (RPA) - note that this has now been changed (per the > attached announcement) > > Wile the RPA terms remain the same, it is no longer necessary to > click-accept and provide an email in order to access ARIN's trust > anchor locator (TAL).
Can you explain in layman terms what the legal consequences of this change are? Kind regards, Job
