> On Jan 20, 2016, at 7:14 AM, nanog-...@mail.com wrote: > > Hello all, > > Would those with IPv6 deployments kindly share some statistics on their > percentage of IPv6 traffic? > > Bonus points for sharing top IPv6 sources. Anything else than the usual > suspects, Google/YouTube, Netflix and Facebook? > > Some public information I've found so far: > - Comcast around 25% IPv6 traffic ( > http://www.lightreading.com/ethernet-ip/ip-protocols-software/facebook-ipv6-is-a-real-world-big-deal/a/d-id/718395 > ) > - Comcast has over 1 Tb/s (of mostly YouTube traffic) over IPv6 ( > http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/comcast-reaches-key-milestone-in-launch-of-ipv6-broadband-network > ) > - Swisscom 26% IPv6 traffic, 60% YouTube ( > http://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog27/p/01_Martin_Gysi.pdf ) > > I'd be very much interested in hearing from smaller ISPs, especially those > having a very limited number of IPv4 addresses and/or running out. > > > Thanks, > > Jared
^^^^^^^ Not me ;) I currently see around 56.4:1 with the timing of peaks the same in v4 and v6. I am talking with a few local wireless ISPs in my area that are going to be running fiber, they currently provide a NAT44 experience and I’m pushing them to deploy IPv6 to preserve their CGN state. This is mostly an exercise in them making the time to enable it vs needing convincing. - [another] Jared
