I’m aware of the /24 block for facilitation concept, but my client’s use case can qualify as an end-user rather than as an ISP, thus their annual operating cost is smaller than even the X-SMALL ISP category, which they’d land in — if they opted for the smaller /36 initial IPv6 direct allocation, rather than the default /32 direct allocation.
That seems to balance toward buying an existing /24. > On Jan 11, 2016, at 8:00 PM, Rafael Possamai <rafaelpo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you apply for an IPv6 block, as an ISP, and you have the intention of > truly utilizing it, then you can apply for a /24 to facilitate that > transition. > > It will cost you about $1500 or so, which is about half of what a /24 is > going for in the transfer market. > > Thing is, if you take the IPv6 block just to use the /24 they give you, then > one could argue you are cheating the system. > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman <mharde...@ipifony.com > <mailto:mharde...@ipifony.com>> wrote: > I’m looking to buy a /24 of space for a new multi-homed network in the ARIN > region. Can anyone out there speak to going rates for a /24 and best places > to shop? > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
