I wouldn't worry about it every byte if the surveillance data is tied to the patent fraud around Us6370629 imho.
Sent from my HTC ----- Reply message ----- From: "Matt Hoppes" <mhop...@indigowireless.com> To: "Tom Berryman" <t...@connectivityit.com.au> Cc: <nanog@nanog.org> Subject: TransPacific Partnership Date: Sun, Jan 3, 2016 16:07 My understanding was if it all goes through here in the US as proposed ISPs would have to provide real time monitoring of data Not as part of CALEA but as part of NSA surveilance. > On Jan 3, 2016, at 18:54, Tom Berryman <t...@connectivityit.com.au> wrote: > > G'Day Matt, > > I'm here in Australia - and yes we are all well aware of the "benefits" of > the TPP. > > What do you mean by burned? > As in the additional accounting and administration overhead of doing business > with operators in TPP participating countries? > > Also, will you be attending PTC? > > > Regards, > Tom Berryman > > > Tom Berryman | CTO > Connectivity I.T. PTY LTD > ABN: 41128650635 > > 1300 22 46 00 (+61356224600) | t...@connectivityit.com.au | AS-58511 > www.connectivityit.com.au | facebook.com/connectivityit | > twitter.com/connectivityit > > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Matt Hoppes > Sent: Monday, 4 January 2016 10:32 AM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: TransPacific Partnership > > Has anyone heard any more regarding the TPP and the proposed additional > monitoring burdens that would be put on ISPs?
