On 1/Jan/16 17:19, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > If you're talking a requirement for connecting geographically separated > locations, there are sound technical reasons for avoiding vpls like the > plague. Unless there are overriding technical reasons why it wouldn't > work, l3vpn will almost always provide a far better quality service. Almost every time a customer has asked me for VPLS (or EVPN), they've been just fine with l3vpn as a suggested alternative. Other customers are all about doing their own routing... Mark.
