> On Dec 16, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > > > On 16/Dec/15 18:36, Ahmed Munaf wrote: > >> In addition to the limited concurrent sessions for ASR1000, we are >> facing some issue with many users how are playing online games! Nat >> problems! > > This could be a function of the size of your ESP. > > The 5Gbps ESP can handle 256,000 NAT sessions, while the 200Gbps ESP > will do 4,000,000 NAT sessions with a per-second setup rate of 300,000 > sessions. > > Of course, it makes little sense to upgrade if you run out of sessions > before you hit the NAT throughput ceiling, so other vendors may be more > commercially palatable. > > Mark. Thats right but as you mentioned that its commercially palatable, however I don’t know if the other vendors are the same performance as ASR1000! this was my question if someone recommend another vendor.
