On 12/5/15 9:37 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> On Dec 4, 2015, at 17:43 , Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >> >>> Or, if you feel that Cogent's stubborn insistence on partitioning the >>> global v6 internet >> >> if A does not peer with B, >> then for all A and B >> they are evil partitioners? >> >> can we lower the rhetoric? >> >> randy > > Does that remain true for values of A where A is willing to peer with > B, but B refuses to peer with A?
These are (mostly) reasonable business decisions engaged by (mostly) reasonable actors. both providers have tools available to them to address the partition unilaterally as one of them does in ipv4 where they so inclined. Neither provider has significant numbers of single homed eyeballs marooned behind them which would be bad. > Owen >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
