Randy Bush wrote: > some friends and i were talking about recent routing cfs, and found we > needed a clearer taxonomy. i throw this out. > > leak - i receive P and send it on to folk to whom i should not send > it for business reasons (transit, peer, ...) > > mis-origination - i originate P when i do not own it > > hijack - an intentional mis-origination > > 7007 - i receive P (or some sub/superset), process it in some way > (likely through my igp), and re-originate it, or part of it, > as my own > > we need a name for 7007 other then vinnie So 7007 (laundering) might be (or not) a subset of a hijack which is a subset of mis-origination. What's the tree for a leak? I think a more structured approach is necessary if we are to delve on both technical definitions and intent.
--Aris
