In message <20151114044614.ga4...@hezmatt.org>, Matt Palmer writes: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:51:52AM +0100, Bjørn Mork wrote: > > So what do we do? We currently point the blocked domains to addresses of > > a web server with a short explanation. But what if the domains were > > signed? We could let validating servers return SERVFAIL. But I'd > > really prefer avoiding that for the simple reason that there is no way > > to distinguish that SERVFAIL from one caused by e.g. a domain owner > > configuration error. > > Perhaps we need to expand RCODE to be the full octet, and indicate "blocked > for legal reasons" with RCODE value 25.
Rcode's were expanded to 12 bits back in 1999. See RFC 2671. > - Matt > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
