not even close to more discussing than from the original spam. Not even close.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Steve Mikulasik <steve.mikula...@civeo.com> wrote: > I think there might be more emails discussing the spam, than the actual > spam itself. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ian Smith > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 12:34 PM > To: Paras <pa...@protrafsolutions.com> > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Uptick in spam > > Filtering *@jdlabs.fr did the trick for me. > > Of course, now I have to write a much more complex filter to hide all the > complaining about NANOG spam :) > > Ian Smith > ________________________________________ > > 161 South St. Hightstown, NJ > 201-315-1316 phone > ian.w.sm...@gmail.com > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Paras <pa...@protrafsolutions.com> > wrote: > > > I see it too, there are some 517 messages in my spam folder "New message" > > > > Most of them get blocked, but a small fraction are still making it > > into my inbox > > > > > > On 10/25/2015 12:13 AM, anthony kasza wrote: > > > >> Has there been a recent uptick in crap sent to the list or is it just > me? > >> Is there anything that we can do to filter these messages with junk > links? > >> > >> -AK > >> > > > > > > > >
