> On Oct 3, 2015, at 14:01 , William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Scott Morizot <tmori...@gmail.com> wrote: >> One of the points in having 64 bits reserved for the host >> portion of the address is that you never need to think or worry about >> individual addresses > > Well, that turned out to be a farce. Instead of worrying about running > out of addresses on the lan, you have to worry about other people > tracking your mobile users through their static 64 bit tail (SLAAC) or > having trouble internally tracking your users (privacy extensions). > Give me the straightforward problem over the subtle one any time.
Both of these are solved through network-hashed persistent IPv6 privacy addresses. Owen
