On Saturday, October 3, 2015, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > The majority of the large eyeball providers in the US are already doing > this to most, if not all, of their customers. > > Comcast I believe has 100% IPv6 availability to residential and I think > they are most of the way on Business too. > > I’m not sure of the percentage, but I know Time Warner Cable is well > underway with their IPv6 deployment. > > Even AT&T is making progress on their DSL and u-Verse services. > > Verizon FIOS is a laggard, which is interesting given that VZW was the > first and still has the best Cellular IPv6 deployment in the US > > (IPv6 ONLY insisting on manufacturers implementing 464XLAT is inferior in > every way to dual stack, so T-Mo loses and to the best of my knowledge, > SPRINT still can’t spell IPv6 to save their life) > > I believe the Samsung Galaxy 6 launched with ipv6 by default on all 4 national networks in the USA
I don’t think any of the MVNOs have any IPv6 capability yet. > > So the problem you are suggesting we focus on is mostly a solved problem. > Content Providers are progressing, modulo some serious laggards, notably > Amazon and a few others. > > The reality, however, is that in terms of deprecating IPv4, there does > need to be a focus on consumer electronics, device support, home router > support and it’s quite overdue. Fortunately, we’re finally starting to see > some movement in that area. > > Owen > > > On Oct 2, 2015, at 07:27 , Steve Mikulasik <steve.mikula...@civeo.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > I think more focus needs to be for carriers to deliver dual stack to > their customers door step, whether they demand/use it or not. Small ISPs > are probably in the best position to do this and will help push the big > boys along with time. If we follow the network effect (reason why IPv4 > lives and IPv6 is slowly growing), IPv6 needs more nodes, all other efforts > are meaningless if they do not result in more users having IPv6 delivered > to their door. > > > > I think people get too lost in the weeds when they start focusing on > device support, home router support, user knowledge, etc. Just get it > working to the people and we can figure out the rest later. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org <javascript:;>] On Behalf > Of Mark Andrews > > Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 6:01 PM > > To: Matthew Newton <m...@leicester.ac.uk <javascript:;>> > > Cc: nanog@nanog.org <javascript:;> > > Subject: Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption > > > > > > In message <20151001232613.gd123...@rootmail.cc.le.ac.uk <javascript:;>>, > Matthew Newton writes: > > > > Additionally it is now a OLD addressing protocol. We are about to see > young adults that have never lived in a world without IPv6. It may not > have been universally available when they were born but it was available. > There are definitely school leavers that have never lived in a world where > IPv6 did not exist. My daughter will be one of them next year when she > finishes year 12. IPv6 is 7 months older than she is. > > > > Some of us have been running IPv6 in production for over a decade now > and developing products that support IPv6 even longer. > > > > We have had 17 years to build up a universal IPv6 network. It should > have been done by now. > > > > Mark > > > >> -- > >> Matthew Newton, Ph.D. <m...@le.ac.uk <javascript:;>> > >> > >> Systems Specialist, Infrastructure Services, I.T. Services, University > >> of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, United Kingdom > >> > >> For IT help contact helpdesk extn. 2253, <ith...@le.ac.uk > <javascript:;>> > > -- > > Mark Andrews, ISC > > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org > <javascript:;> > > > >
