You guys really don't need to argue on list. There are a lot of people subscribed here and I don't feel as if anything constructive is being accomplished. On Oct 2, 2015 4:07 PM, "Justin M. Streiner" <strei...@cluebyfour.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Niels Bakker wrote: > > * t...@ninjabadger.net (Tom Hill) [Fri 02 Oct 2015, 18:34 CEST]: >> >>> Any RIR - or LIR - that considers allocating space in sizes smaller than >>> a /24 (for the purpose of announcing to the DFZ) would do well to read this >>> report from RIPE Labs: >>> >>> >>> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/emileaben/has-the-routability-of-longer-than-24-prefixes-changed >>> >>> tl;dr: it's still a bad idea to allocate smaller than a /24. >>> >> >> RIPE has long allocated up to /29. Not everybody needs addresses for the >> Internet; some just need a guarantee of global uniqueness. >> > > Right, but the OP's question seems to be pointed much more toward global > reachability, not just global uniqueness. > > jms >
