They're already trying - RFC 6598. On the flip side, I'm using subnets from that range for my home network instead of RFC 1918 space right now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -ITG (ITechGeek) i...@itechgeek.com https://itg.nu/ GPG Keys: https://itg.nu/contact/gpg-key Preferred GPG Key: Fingerprint: AB46B7E363DA7E04ABFA57852AA9910A DCB1191A Google Voice: +1-703-493-0128 / Twitter: ITechGeek / Facebook: http://fb.me/Jbwa.Net On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Steve Mikulasik <steve.mikula...@civeo.com> wrote: > Let's just hope carriers don't try to fix IPv4 instead of going to IPv6. > I'd like my children to grow up in a worlds without cgnat. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Satchell > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 1:38 PM > To: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: ARIN Region IPv4 Free Pool Reaches Zero > > On 09/24/2015 09:49 AM, Dovid Bender wrote: > > The issue now is convincing clients that they need it. The other issue > > is many software vendors still don't support it. > > And this may trigger a refresh on routers, as people old or refurbed > equipment find they need to change. The whole reason for the inertia > against going to IPv6 is "it ain't broke, so I not gonna 'fix' it." > > Now it's broke. > >
