> On Sep 1, 2015, at 6:36 PM, Roland Dobbins <rdobb...@arbor.net> wrote: > > On 2 Sep 2015, at 3:24, Niels Bakker wrote: > >> Because variety of flow telemetry delivery options isn't the #1 ranked >> purchasing decider. > > Actually, it is more often than you think. No use routing packets if you > can't see what they do. > >> Otherwise no Cisco would ever have been sold. > > Which is utter nonsense, of course, since Cisco a) invented flow telemetry > and b) has been the consistent leader in innovating flow telemetry (FNF, > IPFIX, anyone?). The EARL6/EARL7 problems are the only stumbles Cisco has > made in this regard.
Roland, Please stop digging, Sounds like you haven’t used Cisco recently. I’m happy to elaborate privately. - Jared
