Hi Jeff As our priority, we will do MPLS VPN, IPv6, Flowspec firstly. In the future, we will consider multicast and EVPN. Thanks.
-----Original Message----- From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:jeff.tants...@ericsson.com] Sent: 2015年8月7日 14:06 To: Peng Xiao (penxiao) Cc: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation Hi Peng, Good stuff! Any plans for multicast, RTC and EVPN AF's? Regards, Jeff > On Aug 6, 2015, at 7:43 PM, Peng Xiao (penxiao) <penx...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Ipv6 and other address families are under development. We have already > designed the data structures for them as you can see from the documentation, > but it's just some testing code and not stable and we are not doing them > after careful consideration. > But at last, they will come out. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu] > Sent: 2015年8月7日 0:16 > To: Peng Xiao (penxiao) > Cc: Jahangir Hossain; xx...@ledeuns.net; nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Yet Another BGP (Border Gateway Protocol) Python Implementation > > On Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:25:55 -0000, "Peng Xiao (penxiao)" said: >> Currently, yabgp does not support IPv6 address family. We only support IPv4 >> now. > > http://tnx.nl/legacy-ip-only.svg > > Seriously guys. It's 2015. We really don't care what you hack for your own > use - but publicly announcing stuff that doesn't have IPv6 support is getting > kind of embarassing... > > *especially* when it's a major vendor open-sourcing their code. (I'm still > willing to cut a *little* slack for "two guys and a stack of empty pizza > boxes" software....) > >
