Yeah wow 127/8, that one always amazed me, 16M addrs because it was computationally cheap to test for ((0x7f & addr) == 0x7f).
I wonder what are the most 127.* addrs ever used by one site? I know there are some schemes which blackhole to 127.0.0.n incrementing n so the number of hits on each blackhole can be counted separately (more or less) but 16M? I doubt even 254 were used in those schemes very often. WWWT? (What Were We Thinking?) Oh well water under the bridge. On July 15, 2015 at 17:53 jfb...@gmail.com (Ricky Beam) wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:34:13 -0400, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > > That covers multicast and RFC-1918. Are there any other IPv4 > > segmentations that you can think of? > ... > > Given that we came up with 3 total segmentations in IPv4 over the course > > #1-3,#4 RFC-1918 is 3 "segments" and we recently added a 4th (for CGN). > #5 Localhost (127/8) > #6 Multicast (224/4) > #7 "Class E" (240/4) > #8 0/8 > #9 255/8 (technically, part of class e, but it's called out specifically > in various RFCs) -- -Barry Shein The World | b...@theworld.com | http://www.TheWorld.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 800-THE-WRLD | Dial-Up: US, PR, Canada Software Tool & Die | Public Access Internet | SINCE 1989 *oo*