Or wait ILNP/ILA https://lwn.net/Articles/647515/
> On 15 июля 2015 г., at 0:09, Matthew Huff <mh...@ox.com> wrote: > > Exactly. > > As a business entity and not a provider, we wouldn't have even contemplated > deploying IPv6 without PI addresses. The myth of easy renumbering and/or > having multiple prefixes/address per host for failover still shows up from > time to time, but mostly gets ignored (at least in the corporate world). > Remember SHIM? > > Any reasonable size organization that expects reliable internet connections > is going to go BGP/PI. > > > > ---- > Matthew Huff | 1 Manhattanville Rd > Director of Operations | Purchase, NY 10577 > OTA Management LLC | Phone: 914-460-4039 > aim: matthewbhuff | Fax: 914-694-5669 > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of John R. Levine > Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 4:50 PM > To: Chuck Church > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: RE: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion > >> What about dual-homed customers? Or are they all expected to have their own >> PI space? > > This is IPv6. Why shouldn't they have their own PI space? > > R's, > John
