On Jul 10, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Mel Beckman 
<m...@beckman.org<mailto:m...@beckman.org>> wrote:

This is a side issue, but I'm surprised ARIN is still advertising incorrect 
information in the table.
...
Are you saying that there is no way to get an IPv6 allocation in the xx-small 
category?
ARIN: Yes. The /36 prefix is the smallest size ARIN is permitted to allocate to 
ISPs according to community-created policy. 
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#six52
...
But ARIN still is advertising the /40 option months later! As a result we as a 
community lost the opportunity to get a new ISP off on the right foot by going 
dual-stacked. This is not good for IPv6 adoption. Hopefully ARIN reads this and 
addresses the issue - either correct the table or honor xx-small requests for a 
/40.

Mel -

  The confusion is very understandable, but both the fee table and the policy 
are
  accurate.   The fee table includes an XX-Small category which corresponds to
  those ISPs which have smaller than /20 IPv4 and smaller than a /36 IPv6 total
  holdings – the fact that such a category exists does not mean that any 
particular
  ISP is being billed in that category (or that a new ISP will necessarily end 
up in
  that category); it simply means that ISPs with those total resources are 
billed
  accordingly.

  The constraint that you experienced, i.e. that there is a minimum IPv6 ISP 
allocation
  size of /36 is actually not something that the staff can fix; i.e. it’s the 
result of the
  community-led policy development process, and if you feel it does need to 
change
  to a lower number, you should propose an appropriate change to policy on the
  ARIN public policy mailing list 
<arin-p...@arin.net<mailto:arin-p...@arin.net>>.

  We _are_ in the midst of considering changes to the fee table to lower and 
realign
  the IPv6 fees in general (which might be a better solution if the cost is 
issue) - see
   
<https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/reports/ARIN_35/PDF/wednesday/curran_fees.pdf>
  for the update provided in April at the ARIN 35 Members meeting, with specific
  options for community discussion at the ARIN Fall meeting taking place in
  Montreal this October (adjacent to the NANOG Fall meeting)

Thanks!
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN




Reply via email to