You should elaborate on some of these 'holes' then.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Ricky Beam <jfb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 21:48:06 -0400, John Curran <jcur...@arin.net> wrote: >> >> Both techniques indicate more than 20% of the US Internet users are >> connecting via IPv6. > > > Interesting method that's full of holes (and they know it), but it's data > nonetheless. > > Globally, it's still ~4.5%. Within my own pool of providers, I'm ZERO for 5. > (I've not pinged TWC-BC lately, 'tho. And no one has gotten back to me that > Earthlink has provided TWC with any prefixes, so us Earthlink cable internet > customers are still dark.) > >> (They’ve also observing a significant performance >> improvement with IPv6 connected users over IPv4 connected... > > > IPv4 tends to be NAT'd and aggressively proxied. I also wouldn't rule out v6 > taking a different path, but that wouldn't explain the magnitude of > difference those slides would suggest. (not really readable via youtube)
