Yep, because most don't even know what NAT is! On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Dennis Burgess <dmburg...@linktechs.net> wrote:
> Most hotels etc, are perfectly happy doing NAT. > > Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. > den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 – www.linktechs.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Oliver O'Boyle > Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 10:20 AM > To: Mel Beckman > Cc: North American Network Operators' Group > Subject: Re: Hotels/Airports with IPv6 > > We manage 65+ hotels in Canada and the topic of IPv6 for guest internet > connectivity has never been brought up, except by me. It's not a discussion > our vendors or the hotel brands have opened either. > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Mel Beckman <m...@beckman.org> wrote: > > > I working on a large airport WiFi deployment right now. IPv6 is > > "allowed for in the future" but not configured in the short term. With > > less than > > 10,000 ephemeral users, we don't expect users to demand IPv6 until > > most mobile devices and apps come ready to use IPv6 by default. > > > > -mel beckman > > > > > On Jul 9, 2015, at 7:53 AM, Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > > > > > It’s my understanding that many captive portals have trouble with > > > IPv6 > > traffic and this is a blocker for places. > > > > > > I’m wondering what people who deploy captive portals are doing with > > these things? > > > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wkumari-dhc-capport > > > > > > seems to be trying to document the method to signal to clients how > > > to > > authenticate. I was having horrible luck with Boingo yesterday at RDU > > airport with their captive portal and deauthenticating me so just went > > to cellular data, so wondering if IPv4 doesn’t work well what works for > IPv6. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > - Jared > > > > > > -- > :o@> > -- :o@>
