On 01/07/2015 17:03, Joe Abley wrote: > The idea of configuring this stuff from the IRR is great in terms of > distributing the ops cycles in the right places, but it doesn't help with > verifying that the end result isn't insane, as I think you and Mike have > described on this list over the past couple of days.
that doesn't invalidate it as being part of a critical mechanism for filtering ebgp. Implemented well, it will catch 99% of problems. maxprefixes with no autorecover catches 75% of the rest. Between these two mechanisms, that's pretty good. Nick
